Global Head of Capital Markets, Group
View bioGlobal Head of Capital Markets, Group
Cliff is responsible for building Intertrust’s unique global offering of capital market solutions. He has over 20 years’ experience working in the Capital Markets for a number of top tier banks including Greenwich Natwest, Bear Sterns and most recently Bank of America Merrill Lynch, originating and delivering structured finance transactions to a wide range of clients.
Cliff’s recent experience includes term ABS transactions for the primary markets, fund finance, senior secured asset backed lending facilities for a range of asset classes, whole loan sales of mortgage and loan portfolios including performing and non-performing loans, managing legacy asset positions and ABS and high yield bond broker.
CloseThe long-awaited regulation changes for London SPACs are set to boost activity in the city
New regulations governing Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) in London will create a progressive package that is arguably more competitive and price sensitive than that in the US and other listing hotspots.
With the new regulations in play as of 10 August 2021, we may see a stream of new London SPACs listings, with sponsors switching from bottlenecked markets such as Amsterdam or Luxembourg.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) guidelines manage to protect investors without being too prescriptive, through redemption options that can be laid out in the prospectus. These give investors greater flexibility if they want to get out of a prospective acquisition or an incoming Private into Public Equity (PIPE) investor’s agenda that they are uncomfortable with.
The FCA says that the changes – which have been the subject of consultations since April 2021 – are designed to provide an alternative approach for SPACs that must otherwise give the market detailed information about a proposed target to avoid being suspended.
SPAC sponsors will have to provide additional investor safeguards including:
SPAC issuers who cannot or choose not to meet the conditions will still be subject to a presumption of suspension.
After the consultation, the FCA changed its original proposals:
Reducing the target listing requirement from £200m to £100m opens up the number of possible targets, making London considerably more competitive than Nasdaq, for instance. The minimum listing requirements for SPAC Nasdaq listings are targets with an average valuation/market cap of $550m (capitalisation with cash flow) or $850m (capitalisation with revenue).
Sponsors set on listing in the US have found a decreasing number of attractive targets can realistically be priced at such valuations. There has already been much discussion about US sponsors finding themselves pressured to acquire a company just to complete a trade.
The longer timeframe in London raises the chances of finding a target, but questions remain over how long investors will wait. Three and a half years seems a long time to sit tight for any return, although it may fit a patient capital horizon.
We are unlikely to see much significant positive trading activity or value being realised through the secondary market in that timeframe. It will be interesting to see which sectors are preferred and show most promise after the de-SPAC period.
For the most part, the FCA has shown itself willing to give the emerging SPAC market a fighting chance of success by eliminating problem areas witnessed in other markets, such as celebrity-endorsed SPACs in the US.
London has a clear motive – to sustain its long-term viability – for making sure institutional investors are more likely to become involved in the SPAC market. Without institutional investors it has previously been hard for the London Stock Exchange (LSE) or the FCA to ensure retail investors remain protected.
The redemption of the predetermined price in the prospectus has obvious benefits. Sponsors, private market, institutional and, increasingly, savvy retail investors are likely to welcome the new London SPACs rules.
Time will tell just how sustainable SPACs actually are. But as more formidable players start to have a greater influence on the calibre of targets coming to market – for example when private equity portfolios exit via a SPAC – we could see greater institutionalisation of this burgeoning asset class.